1,000
3.00@CodeandSolder unless anybody suggests a better solution I intend to do this in a day or two. Would it be a good idea to open the market before that to allow people to recover some Mana?
@TamarSpoerri if you mean resolving NO and refunding anybody who disagrees that would still be the plan, reopening would have the goal of allowing people to reduce their loss for leagues and such, though in practice the first person would probably exhaust liquidity anyway
@CodeandSolder Exactly, which is why that seems unfair. If you’re concerned about effect on league performance (which I think is not your problem, but okay), note that the stakes for everyone are low enough that it’s unlikely that a loss of <40 mana will change their rank.
@TamarSpoerri TBH my brain seems somewhat incompatible with the idea of "not my problem" but yeah, fair enough
@CodeandSolder Hey, power to you! I respect your thoughtfulness and sense of responsibility
@CodeandSolder Again, I took the literal interpretation and bought on the understanding that the P did not qualify. If you consider the P to be two flags, each are too small to qualify. If you consider the P to be one flag, it is a “rainbow-trans flag” but not “a rainbow or trans flag,” as per the question. Also, the criteria say it goes based on the atlas annotation, which does not label it a rainbow flag or a trans flag (or any flag, strangely enough). It also describes it is a collaboration between the LGBTQ and trans community, indicating that this was from two communities, not one.