I personally believe that the workers at DOGE do not have the same degree of security on their own devices as the rest of the government, and that these devices were compromised.

@Social_Anthrax Seems likely, along with a culture of 'move fast and remove obstacles, if we break stuff we can fix it later' which is problematic in the bolting horse world of espionage/cybersecurity.

This would, I think, result in a NO resolution if true.

Give or 'give'?

@PaulBenjaminPhotographer Give, no quotes. I don't know what the quoted version would be.

@CraigDemel

Give - Intentionally provide the passwords to Russians (whether DOGE knew they were Russians or not)

'Give' - Allow Russian agents to take the passwords through incompetence, say through storing them in plaintext or discussing on Signal after Trevor added 'MoscowHotChick745' to the group chat.

I'd include DOGE employee being Russian spy in the latter category but I could see arguments the other way.

@PaulBenjaminPhotographer Your 'give' definition is not giving in any sense.

If a DOGE employee is a Russian spy who gives passwords to Russian hackers, it will resolve YES.