This question will resolve positively on the 1st of January, 2025
134
Ṁ320k
Jan 2
99%
chance
This market resolves positively on the 1st of January, 2025. This question is meant to find out whether Manifold users are incentivized to correctly predict on longer-term markets, and, to some extent, what the implied discount rate is. Note that with Manifold's lending functionality, you can bet the first M$20 for free.
Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:

@guzey @ChameLeon @EntropyBot @Gurkenglas care to elaborate on your reasoning?

@mods i think this qualifies as unranked?

Agreed.

bought Ṁ8,221 NO

idk why nobody's betting no

I think “resolve positively” means he’s telling us it will resolve YES on that date. I believe the purpose of the market is to see the implied discount rate based on the distance from resolution.

But we can just bet no

But if on January 1st you hold any NO, and this resolves YES, you will lose all the mana.

that is true

are you the real alexey guzey

no

opened a Ṁ50,000 YES at 12% order

why are you burning money lol?

bought Ṁ25,000 NO

i'm not

I think it's bad to use this site as a way to gamble or throw away money instead of predicting

i'm not gambling and i'm not throwing away money

what are you doing then

i'm having fun

based. go big or go home. 1m mana

opened a Ṁ40,000 YES at 2% order

(no)

ok

opened a Ṁ1,000 YES at 8% order

WTF is going on 😭

These questions only measure what the most optimistic trader thinks the discount rate is

Everyone else who knows the discount rate is higher obviously has much better opportunities than betting NO on questions that'll resolve YES in year(s). Because Manifold's discount rate is obviously much higher than these questions imply, we instead borrow tens of thousands at exorbitantly higher interest rates from whales like @jack and easily profit more than enough to cover that interest. Those loan interest rates are closer to actual discount rates, and are usually at least 60% APY from my experience

@PatMyron I would say instead that they measure the general risk-free interest rate, made accounting for loan-back from Manifold. When Jack loans mana:

  • It is not a risk-free loan

  • There are administrative costs for Jack

  • Manifold doesn't auto-repay Jack's loan at 2%/day.

So it's natural for Jack's interest rate to be much higher. I think people are rational when they bet a market like this up to 99%.

@MartinRandall I agree the rate for absolutely no risk or effort at all is lower, but the description says "This question is meant to find out whether Manifold users are incentivized to correctly predict on longer-term markets" which involves both risk and effort. I still think those loans I mentioned are more meaningful information than these markets for determining that

@PatMyron I agree with your points, but this is still useful as a lower bound