Is the Reuters report about AI breakthrough Q* contributing to Sam Altman's firing accurate?
Basic
21
Ṁ4.2k2025
10%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
https://twitter.com/alexeheath/status/1727472179283919032
Am hearing from multiple sources, including an OpenAI spokesperson, that this Reuters report, “Sam Altman's ouster at OpenAI was precipitated by letter to board about AI breakthrough,” is not true
Resolves to my judgement, whenever information that could resolve this comes out and consensus is reached, or the judgement of a moderator resolution council if disputed
Get Ṁ600 play money
Sort by:
@jacksonpolack That correction does not appear in the linked article, but I can see in this msn copy of the article https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/openai-researchers-warned-board-of-ai-breakthrough-ahead-of-ceo-outster-sources/ar-AA1knK64
More related questions
Related questions
Would the general public narrative about why Sam Altman was fired from OpenAI be significantly different 1 year later?
20% chance
Is the firing of Sam Altman good for OpenAI?
14% chance
Will Sam Altman be killed by AI?
19% chance
Was Sam Altman fired because the board suspected he'd created an undisclosed AGI?
4% chance
Will the first AGI build on some novel aspect of the Q* 'breakthrough' that reportedly contributed to the Altman firing?
15% chance
Is the firing of Sam Altman and the current situation at OpenAI mainly a consequence of an internal breakthrough?
8% chance