Does this resolve yes even if the order never goes into effect? E.g. blocked by courts, retracted due to public backlash, etc.

 i would like this market to include more intermediate tail risks than just circumstances around an uncontested order so i think yes but am open to arguments i suppose

bro was surprisingly not lying about the subsidy

Will only resolve true if the governor of one or more of New York, California or Illinois issues an order closing nonessential in-person businesses while citing a coronavirus-driven public health emergency. Event must happen between now and the end of 2024 to resolve true.

Related questions

Related questions