Semi-relevant arbitration opportunity:

There is not a single YES position on this and I wonder why. Is the idea of banning not feasible without some corresponding experience of desaster? Or is it so that we accept there is no realistic path to stay away from destructive potential without a threat of mutual annihilation to force us into a standoff situation? What does game theory say about this and do we feel like we can rise above it's dynamic by conscious effort?

@Tegwick USA will most likely veto any such ban: https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/arts-culture/584219-us-official-rejects-plea-to-ban-killer-robots/

I think there is not a lot of YES positions because this matter is not something a UN resolution could do even with support from the five permanent Security Council members.