Why was Dr Disrespect banned from Twitch?
Basic
5
Ṁ1297
resolved Jul 24
Resolved
YES
Sexual assault allegation against Doc
Resolved
NO
E3 bathroom filming incident
Resolved
NO
Twitch found out that he was lying about potential Mixer contracts
Resolved
NO
Twitch wanted to end the contract with Doc after Mixer shutdown
Resolved
NO
Spreading conspiracy theories
Resolved
NO
Money laundering
Resolved
NO
Consensual infidelity with another high profile streamer

For an answer to resolve to YES it must be directly related to the reason it was banned. I will N/A options that are too ambivalent or too close to an existing answer.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S1.00
Sort by:
bought Ṁ100 Twitch wanted to end... NO

resolves - truth came out today

https://x.com/evoli/status/1804309358106546676

bought Ṁ35 Money laundering NO

@mods in case

resolved, not sure what to do about the remaining one answer

can ask mods to na?

actually the minor wasnt a high profile streamer so probably no (afaik)

you'l have to resolve NO or ask @mods to NA if you think that is needed @Kire_

In general I'd suggest deciding whether or not that was part of the reasoning, to whatever standards of evidence this market requires. And then either resolving it to Yes or No, or deciding it's ok to wait for more info. You could also make a case for PROB if you think the current evidence suggests it's likely but not certain, and that there won't be more evidence forthcoming. In general I'd advise against that option because it's hard to figure out what number to resolve it to.

I don't really see a case for N/A here; there's not a precondition that wasn't met or something, it sure sounds like we're getting enough info about this in general to resolve questions of this nature, and so on.

That said, I don't think we have clear policies about when N/A is or isn't ok; if that's what you want then that's probably what we'll end up going with.

Since it is most likely false (given that there have been no rumors about the other party involved) I'm going to resolve no in one month, unless additional information becomes available.

Sounds good!