A plan is considered reasonable if:-
If it allocates a considerable amount of additional space for housing these civilians, in addition to the current evacuation zone. At least 2/3 of the evacuated area in Rafah.
The safety of the civilians is guaranteed to a reasonable level in that area. It is not an active fighting area (as evidenced by ISW reports) and buildings don't regularly get bombed there (less than one bombing a week).
Alternatively, if these civilians are guaranteed a safe refuge outside of Gaza, that also counts, as long as their passage is indeed guaranteed (subject only to security checks) and the other conditions apply. Note that this is not an endorsement of this or any other solution, I am merely curious to see if the Israeli government comes up with a real plan.
Resolves N/A if the war ends or at the end of 2024, whichever is sooner, if an invasion hasn't occured.
Related questions
@SusanneinFrance I am aware of one airstrike on the humanitarian zone that happened since the IDF started the evacuation of Rafah. But I agree that the safety condition seems to be satisfied.
@traders Hi Traders. Sorry for not being very unresponsive. I plan to review this shortly, it probably should be resolved. Please send any links or arguments that you would like to have considered in resolution. There seems to be some conflicting information online so this might be tricky
@Shump In which points does your information disagree?
In my recent experience, anti-Israel accounts on social media routinely make up claims about real attacks, stating that those took place in a "safe zone". But that is usually easy to refute.