I think all of the remaining eligible options can resolve NO.

@GeoffWolfe Looks like a NO

@drewmummy she already did

@Marnix Ooo how did i miss that sorry

@drewmummy at least I'm pretty sure she did. now that i briefly look around I'm marginally less confident idk

@Marnix same here, seems like some publications count a declaration of brat as an endorsement but based on the criteria I don't know whether I agree

Arnold isn't an option here but I still thought I'd share his tweet

@BlueDragon https://x.com/kamalahq/status/1850001028344643954?s=46&t=WavuhYisKVKuwWFJUqwhzQ

@ManifoldPolitics

She did endorse ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

https://www.inc.com/kit-eaton/amazon-says-alexa-upgrade-skewed-ai-to-harris.html

@BlueDragon Assuming the answer even counts, when did that happen?

please don't submit anyone who has already endorsed Harris

@NicoDelon Oh the article is dated September 6 and you just submitted the answer. It definitely should not count.

@NicoDelon Well I think you are right, this market is ill-conceived. Not right. But funny!

@BlueDragon The point is to make predictions not to record the facts. So it makes sense that you shouldn’t be able to add options after the fact.

Why was RFK resolved NA? @ManifoldPolitics

@Philip3773733 Did you mean RFK? It was a duplicate of the previously existing "RFK Jr." option.
I don't see a "jfk" option.

NYT: Romney Won’t Endorse Harris, Saying He Wants to Keep His Voice in the Party

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/08/us/politics/mitt-romney-trump-harris.html

Bummer that adding options costs M1000!

@NicoDelon Got suggestions?

@Joshua Condoleeza Rice!

Thanks. You're the best!

This one resolves yes, I believe. Weird that they're calling next to no attention to it, though. And why'd they do this as a podcast wyd nyt https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/30/opinion/kamala-harris-patriotic-choice-president.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

nytimes.com

@Marnix is the NYT editorial board a person?

@NicoDelon I probably should have already N/A-d if I was going to, I think it's fine.

@NicoDelon I suppose it'd technically be a group of people, but it still endorses like any other person would 😛