
If any of these events were to happen before 1st January 2025, I will resolve that answer to N/A
Update 2024-17-12 (PST): - Monarchs and anyone on the List of current state leaders by date of assumption of office will be counted (AI summary of creator comment)
Update 2025-27-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - US military conquest does not count as an event that would resolve the answer to YES
Greenland must join the USA voluntarily to resolve YES
Update 2025-27-01 (PST): - Resolution authority: NASA (AI summary of creator comment)
Update 2025-02-23 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Clear Death Confirmation Requirement
The outcome concerning King Charles will only be resolved if it is unequivocally confirmed that he is dead, not merely if there is temporary ambiguity or an apparent death.
Update 2025-02-24 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Children Eligibility Update:
Both past children and future children will be considered for the resolution criteria.
People are also trading
@Gameknight Can you clarify: Does this require Los Ratones to compete in Worlds, or just their roster to physically attend?
@RedzoneITG This requires LR to compete in Worlds. "To simply physically attend the event" is neither the original intent nor the common interpretation of the phrase.
@PoliticalEconomyPK I have edited this answer to fix an obvious typo. It's supposed to be GTA 6 not GTA 5
@PoliticalEconomyPK this doesn't necessarily limit to past children, future children will also count
@PoliticalEconomyPK How are we dealing with recent squirrely claims that Elon is not a govt employee but an advisor?
@PoliticalEconomyPK what evidence do you need. Wikipedia thinks it is a regular occurrence, but the market on the issue holds to a silly evidentiary standard...
@JussiVilleHeiskanen i have edited the answer to make it more precise "Attempted assassination on Zelensky in which he gets hurt but survives" i think it makes it more concrete now
@PoliticalEconomyPK certainly easier to resolve. It is hard to fit resolution criteria in just so many characters
@PoliticalEconomyPK personally I would have been satisfied with resolution criteria given as a comment
@copiumarc I added a stronger version of this one if you want throw more into that question.
I'm not betting on the 90% question because I think there are a number of questions that have human errors resulting in no correct answer, which the model might be so intelligent that it finds a second answer to, or which are ambiguous.