Conditional on a consensus 20 years from now that sperm count has been declining, what will scientists believe was the most important factor?
Plus
48
Ṁ13542043
55%
Plastics
5%
Pesticides
0.3%
Sunlight and circadian rhythm
37%
Diet and obesity
2%
Porn
Related ACX post Declining Sperm Count: Much More Than You Wanted To Know. I will go off of some combination of how sure scientists are that it matters, vs. how big scientists think the effect is.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000
and3.00
Sort by:
@connorwilliams97 That's a fair observation. We'll probably focus on the publicly expressed opinions, as we can't truly know what's going on in people's minds
@JeffKaufman I bought some based on guessing yes, but less than I would have if I was sure it was a yes.
Related questions
Related questions
In twenty years, will the best evidence show very substantial (>one quarter) declines in fertility rate (relative to couples trying equally hard to conceive in the past) due to decreasing sperm count, in at least one country?
16% chance
Will Amish fertility drop below 5 children per women by the end of 2040?
59% chance
Will the causal factors for the global secular decline in men's testosterone levels become clear by 2028?
53% chance
In twenty years, the best evidence will suggest that sperm counts are substantially declining across most of the world
64% chance
In 2040, will expert consensus suggest there are strong innate psychological differences by biological sex?
55% chance
In 2030, what will consensus say is the primary cause of the decline in testosterone levels over the past few decades?
Will over 100,000 people be conceived with the help of advanced embryo selection techniques by 2030?
44% chance
Will the WHO state that there is conclusive evidence that microplastics exposure reduces human fertility by 2026?
44% chance
In twenty years, will the best evidence available suggest that sperm counts have been substantially declining across most of the world?
78% chance
Who will be the most successful pro-natalist by 2040?