Yeah, I think that the strike is now resolved, so as worded this resolves NO even though we don't know for sure that they won't get a deal that includes them later. Planning to resolve tomorrow-ish.

I am pretty sure this resolves NO but I'm going to wait a bit in case anyone thinks that's not clear yet.

@ZviMowshowitz I don't have a position on this market, but it sounds like automation restrictions are an ongoing part of the negotiations that resulted from this strike. I don't think we'll actually know until the final deal is arrived at.

@IsaacCarruthers The strike ended with negotiated terms. "Resolves to YES if the resolution of the strike includes...". It is possible that Zvi intended to ask the broader question "Will dockworkers negotiate additional restrictions on automation" but that is not how the question or resolution criteria are worded.

@becauseyoudo I would not say that the strike has resolved. It has tentatively ended pending an actual resolution that is expected in January. If the final agreement in January includes a blanket ban on all automation, would you really say that it did not result from this strike? Or that that agreement was not a part of the resolution of this strike?

@IsaacCarruthers The negotiations have not been fully resolved, but the strike did end with negotiated terms. This market's resolution criteria isn't ambiguous on the point you're contesting.

It looks like automation restrictions were not part of the strike resolution.

"The tentative agreement does not resolve differences between the union and shipping companies over the use of automated machinery, sources said. That will be a key focus of negotiations between both sides from now until January 15."

https://abcnews.go.com/US/dockworkers-strike-suspended-sources/story?id=114445386

I wrote one for wages:
/EvanDaniel/what-will-be-the-base-wage-for-ila