For the purpose of this market, we will not argue about the definition of open source.
We now support unresolving/re-resolving markets of this format. Please let me know which answers need amending!
(or u can just do it yourself @firstuserhere )
@firstuserhere Are you trying to resolve this? This is the biggest loss I've had on this site. I looked at the website and it said:
March 17, 2024
Open Release of Grok-1
We are releasing the weights and architecture of our 314 billion parameter Mixture-of-Experts model, Grok-1.
So I put a lot on it, thinking it was a sure thing. 😣
This should have resolved to yes: https://x.ai/blog/grok-os
It clearly says the weights are released and there is a link to them.
@firstuserhere Then this should be NA as most of us here can’t really understand that “the weights” you refer to is different from gross definition of “the weights”
@firstuserhere There's a fair amount of ambiguity in "all the model weights."
Text is:
"We are releasing the base model weights and network architecture of Grok-1, our large language model. Grok-1 is a 314 billion parameter Mixture-of-Experts model trained from scratch by xAI.
This is the raw base model checkpoint from the Grok-1 pre-training phase, which concluded in October 2023. This means that the model is not fine-tuned for any specific application, such as dialogue."
So they did not release all the model weights of Grok, but they did release all the model weights of a pre-training phase of Grok.
@Snarflak I would actually tend to think 'no' is a better resolution, as the question referred to "Grok" with quotes, and we got the model weights of "the raw base model checkpoint from the Grok-1 pre-training phase." What's your reasoning?
@HarrisonNathan From the website:
March 17, 2024
Open Release of Grok-1
We are releasing the weights and architecture of our 314 billion parameter Mixture-of-Experts model, Grok-1.
@Tyler31 its under the assumption they release it soon, if it's mid April and still nothing, I'll resolve all to N/A
Edit: this originally said NO but thinking about it, N/A makes sense.