A new image generation system comes out which has accurate text generation, and interest in it surpasses Stable diffusion and Midjourney

AI DALLE3 Midjourney GPT-4o DeepFloyd

Basic

Ṁ1.9k

2025

70%

chance

ALL

it will be a new term
it will surpass the historical peaks of stable diffusion & midjourney visibile in the image below, on the same y axis
i.e. when it comes out, the total interest in it will be higher than the total interest was in those prior two systems at their peak

Get Ṁ600 play money

Related questions

Which tool will be the leading AI text-to-image generator at the end of 2024?

Midjourney will be able to create images of people with different facial expressions by end 2024

67% chance

Is Diffusion Models all you need for image generation?

45% chance

Will MidJourney add support for in-house AI Video Generation in 2024?

80% chance

Will real-time text-to-video generation be viable by 2030?

88% chance

Will any image model available to the public be able to generate arbitrary non-adversarial text before 2025?

69% chance

Will real-time text-to-video generation be viable by 2027?

30% chance

When will Midjourney first be able to create correct text in images? V6 may do it!

Reliable compositions (AI using prepositions) via text-to-image by the end of 2024

29% chance

Will there be an open source, uncensored AI image generator with the same or greater quality as DALLE-3 by end of 2025?

Sort by:

I believe GPT-4o has native image generation capabilities & accurate text

@SaviorofPlant agree on the tech based on the demo images.. this claim is specific about how to evaluate it so I'm waiting. Hopefully it comes out to the API soon

@Ernie How would you measure the trends data for this? Most users are probably going to be searching "ChatGPT" and not "GPT-4o"

@SaviorofPlant yeah. The claim is fairly focused on hype level of the image generation tool, so it's not about absolute image quality actually, but rather being able to measure a high hype level.

Measuring it by searches for chatgpt would incorrectly include general gpt info, so that doesn't seem wise.

I'm open to ways to fairly measure this including combining search terms